The Economic Times

Where sleep is competition

Since the pandemic, Hollywood’s old formats have nosedived and turned belly up in commercial terms. The new ones are not growing fast enough nor making much profit. Cinema and Cable seem to be on a journey into the history books. As the Titanic sinks, Hollywood’s streaming businesses are not proving to be viable lifeboats. New platform content appears only a bonfire where value turns to ash. [siteorigin_widget class=”SiteOrigin_Widget_Image_Widget”][/siteorigin_widget] There was no business like the show business. It gave a much-esteemed soft power to a few nations, by itself no less significant than nuclear might. The change of technology or delivery modalities scarcely affected the primacy of the West. Its ability to export its culture far and wide was enviously acknowledged. Then decline set in. The rise of Asia made media a multipolar industry. And then corona shut the world down. Since the pandemic, Hollywood’s old formats have nosedived and turned belly up in commercial terms. The new ones are not growing fast enough nor making much profit. Cinema and Cable seem to be on a journey into the history books. As the Titanic sinks, Hollywood’s streaming businesses are not proving to be viable lifeboats. New platform content appears only a bonfire where value turns to ash. While Apple and Amazon invest in streaming as a loss-leader for their other businesses, traditional leaders such as Disney have seen erosion of market value by half. In November 2022, Disney sacked its CEO Bob Chapek, and brought back his predecessor Bob Iger from retirement. Catching a falling knife safely calls for luck. The industry is in long-term decline, as households swap expensive cable packages for cheaper streaming services, as well as free content on YouTube. Mark Bergen writes about this extensively in his book “Like, Comment, Subscribe – Inside YouTube’s Chaotic Rise to World Domination”. Within a decade of its founding, YouTube had set the model for on demand, lightning-fast internet television and become the place for free online video. It remains the second most frequented website on earth behind its parent Google. A third of the world’s internet population visits it daily. That is staggering and it does not need genius to imagine the magnitude of the drift. Wish that could be said about good old network TV. Primetime audience on TV in America is about half of what it used to be five years ago. The three networks look like stunned dinosaurs. Since July 2022, Americans have spent more time streaming than watching cable, according to Nielsen. Only sports broadcasting makes the show go on but profitability is a huge challenge. To win subscribers, Hollywood’s biggest studios have ramped up their combined content spending by 50% since 2019. Amazon and Apple have been writing very fat cheques that have raised costs for everyone. Studios have pumped money mostly into established properties. No more do they have the appetite to spend hundreds of millions of dollars in global promotions and make a return from box office earnings over a relatively short period by establishing new IP. America’s ten biggest films last year were all sequels or parts of a running franchise such as Avatar or Indiana Jones. Entire new categories of entertainment will emerge or get hybridised. For young adults in rich countries gaming is bigger than television in terms of time spent. Hollywood has been slow to catch on, but its Silicon Valley rivals are snapping up gaming IPs. Microsoft’s proposed acquisition of Activision-Blizzard, whose games include “Call of Duty” and “Candy Crush”, is worth $69 billion, ten times what Amazon paid for Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. Movies based on games are becoming as popular as games based on movies. When “The Last of Us” came out in 2013, the hit video game’s premise seemed outrageous fiction. Imagine a fungus turns people into zombies, leaving society in shambles. It would have been impossible to turn to a viable plot back then. Cut to a decade later and it is a hugely anticipated HBO series going out to a world only too familiar with a pandemic. Over the past decade, as video games have become more vivid and complex, developers have used the medium to spin rich, character-based stories that rival film and TV in depth and quality. “The Last of Us,” for instance, is less about an outbreak and civilisational chaos than the father-daughter relationship between a smuggler named Joel and a 14-year-old girl named Ellie. While game-to-screen adaptations like the “Tomb Raider,” “Resident Evil” and “Sonic the Hedgehog” franchises have made enough money to warrant sequels, unlike comic books, the stories in video games have never been properly translated across media boundaries. For Hollywood it is a gold mine of intellectual property with a built-in audience of gamers thus far unexploited. Viewers should prepare to see more games onscreen soon: Other popular video game franchises with film and TV adaptations in the works include “Twisted Metal,” “Ghost of Tsushima” and “Assassin’s Creed”. Spurred on by the pandemic, which saw video-game spending increase by nearly a quarter in 2020, the games industry was worth more than $170 bn in 2021, in worldwide revenues. That’s about five times as much as the global box office. A shift towards subscriptions and cloud gaming could fundamentally reshape the landscape. Subscription gaming is growing fast, but even in five years it will represent less than 10% of game spending as per estimates. Streaming from the cloud is still less popular. Google will shut down Stadia, its cloud-gaming service. Amazon’s Luna service has yet to take off. Microsoft, which separately runs Azure, the world’s second-largest cloud network, is well placed for cloud gaming if and when it emerges. As of today, streaming services represent well under 1% of games spending. Cloud gaming aims to do for video games what companies like Spotify and Netflix have done for music and films – make them available on any device with an internet connection. For the gaming industry, that would be a revolution. The consoles and beefy PCs required to run modern

Where sleep is competition Read More »

Where do all the good CMOs go?

Govind Iyer reckons that marketing talent from the top drawer is always in demand simply because there aren’t too many honchos in that elite cluster. A consultant at Egon Zehnder International, Iyer would know. Way back in 1999, the search firm poached him from foods company Heinz. When Iyer made the switch to headhunting 13 years ago, after 11 years in marketing (Coke and P&G were his other employers), marketing hotshots bounding from their comfort zones into alien sectors was a rare phenomenon. Not anymore. A fortnight ago, when Rajesh Jejurikar announced that he would be joining Zee Entertainment as president by February 2012, he clambered onto a rapidly growing list of marketing whizzes plunging into uncharted waters. [siteorigin_widget class=”SiteOrigin_Widget_Image_Widget”][/siteorigin_widget] Currently designated as chief of operations at Mahindra & Mahindra’s (M&M’s) automotive business, Jejurikar has spent over a decade at the utility and tractor maker after joining as vice president of sales & marketing. “A shift across sectors helps improve the ability to grasp new concepts. There is cross deployment of learning and one is not stuck within the conventional wisdom of one particular industry,” says the 47-year-old Jejurikar. Like Jejurikar, there is a clutch of chief marketing officers (CMOs) seeking “cross-deployment of learning” and jumping the ship of conventional wisdom. In June 2011, Srikanth Srinivasamadhavan moved out of consumer goods giant Hindustan Unilever (HUL) to head marketing at HSBC India. At HUL, Srinivasamadhavan worked across a range of marketing functions, from media planning to brand management to category head. “I do believe India is one of the best places for recruiting marketing leadership not just for local needs but for even the global markets. I do see this phenomenon getting stronger as India as a market matures and grows,” says the HSBC marketing head. Such growth and development particularly in sunrise service sectors such as telecom, organised retailing and aviation have given birth to marketing professionals who consciously seek new industries. Consider, for instance, Milind Bade who recently quit Bajaj Auto after three years to join Vodafone as senior vice president for sales & marketing for Maharashtra and Goa circles. Bade has a total working experience of 16 years, which includes two stints at Kimberly Clark Lever and HUL. Indeed, HUL has provided a springboard to many marketing managers. However, a chunk of those moves would be within fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG), be it soaps or cosmetics or liquor or foods. These days, however, marketing executives are more willing to check out opportunities in other services sectors. Shubhranshu Singh spent a decade at HUL and then moved on to liquor maker Diageo India for a year and a half. In August 2011, Singh made a clean break — he joined Visa as marketing director for India and South Asia. If CMOs are open to changing tracks, it may be because the fundamentals don’t change, only what they’re marketing — and to whom — does. “It is the understanding of the consumer, the target audiences and the brand and its core values that make one assignment different from the other,” explains Anupama Ahluwalia. The head of marketing at Coca-Cola India has a chance to gain that understanding all over again in a new milieu. She joined the beverages giant in June after moving out from Idea Cellular as a senior vice president for marketing. Ahluwalia is the only woman on Coca-Cola’s leadership council, which reports into president & CEO Atul Singh. Ahluwalia may have just been inspired by Joseph Tripodi to change industries. Tripodi joined Coca-Cola at the global headquarters in Atlanta in 2007 as CMO after over a quarter of a century of selling everything from insurance and credit cards to oil and liquor with some of the world’s most respected brands. On a recent visit to India, Tripodi told ET that he’s used the “industry, geographic and function experiences” from other firms liberally to change mindsets and philosophies at Coke. As an example, he said he brought along from one of his previous employers, MasterCard, the culture of creating “lifetime consumer value” to Coke. Shifting industries at a time when brands, categories and consumers are evolving may be a great opportunity for marketing folk — but only if they are willing to keep up with the rapidly changing times and trends. In March 2011, Shailendra Katyal left consumer goods company Marico after heading a category for 12 years to become director, marketing, at Lenovo India. A shift from selling hair oil to personal computers can prove tricky. But Katyal says he recognised the differences between the two sectors, and that has stood him in good stead. “In FMCG it is about ensuring brand loyalty while in technology the landscape is more competitive — it involves, for instance, consumers shifting from desktops to laptops to iPads. The sheer pace of change is different in each sector,” says the man who played a key role in crafting Marico’s hair care strategy. A larger responsibility — and with it of course a fatter pay packet and a higher profile — is one reason why most people move out of their comfort zones. On occasion, however, it’s the sheer expanse of the fresh canvas that persuades executives to bail out of cosy marketing niches. Consider Rajiv Dube, who quit the country’s largest conglomerate, the Tata group, after spending more than 25 years with it. The last 12 of those were with Tata Motors, from where he drove out in May 2010 when he was president of the car operations. Dube moved into yet another huge conglomerate, the $35 billion Aditya Birla group, as director, group corporate services. In his exit interview to ET, Dube said, “It is always tough to leave a company after 27 years, but from running a car operation my new role offers an exposure to 14 different businesses in different industries.” There are cases of marketing honchos who make the switch because they’ve reached the end of the road in their organisation. But in a consumption-led, rapidly-growing

Where do all the good CMOs go? Read More »

Senior execs head for exit at HUL

At least eight senior and middle-level executives have quit Hindustan Unilever over the past two months after spending more than a decade with India’s largest fast moving consumer goods company, indicating a festering dissatisfaction with pressures both within and outside the organisation. Among those who have quit are Sandeep Kataria, global brand director, Comfort who is joining as CMO, Yum Restaurants; Rishi Pardaal, GM, South, who is moving to Marico Bangladesh as CEO and Anuradha Agarwal, marketing manager, hair, who has joined Vodafone as VP, brand marketing (See graphic). At one level, senior employees find growth opportunities limiting even as competing brands are giving HUL’s brands a tough time in the marketplace, said a company official who did not wish to be quoted. [siteorigin_widget class=”SiteOrigin_Widget_Image_Widget”][/siteorigin_widget] The HUL spokesperson, however, said the attrition rate was significantly below industry level. “What we have is natural attrition, which is essential and healthy for all organisations in terms of both talent management and development,” the spokesperson said. HUL has been facing pressures from competitors like P&G, Godrej and L’Oreal across categories like detergents, toilet soaps and hair care at the top end and from indigenous brands like Ghari, Godrej No. 1, Santoor, Chik and Dabur at the next level. Another reason for the dissatisfaction is the division of the brand manager function into brand building, brand development and customer marketing roles over the past decade. The new roles have restricted a brand manager’s exposure, said the official quoted earlier. Moreover, multiyear plans laid down for brands have been changed, and local brand managers are being asked to report on 30-day schedules, adding to the pressure. “The organisation is a pyramid, and when you reach a certain senior level you want more acceleration in the decisions you can make, but there is a lack of velocity I have to deal with, which is disappointing,” said an executive who did not wish to be quoted. The disquiet has not gone unnoticed at HUL, which has devised the ‘multi-lane progress’ as a sort of antidote. While it will take some time for the process to come into effect, it allows for professionals to choose between brand building, brand development and sales functions in the earlier stage of their career. Once they have identified what suits them, the best performers are given larger responsibilities at regional or national levels in their respective functions. In the world outside, there is something that still works for HUL: it is a sought-after employer on B-school campuses. The company was rated as the dream company to work for by graduating students across the top 20 B-Schools in India as per AC Nielsen’s Campus Track Survey, says the company spokesperson. Today, companies like Nokia, Dabur and Cadbury are shining examples of what HUL “alumni” have achieved outside. Perhaps it’s time the organisation needs to take a long, hard look at itself, says the executive. In the world outside, there is something that still works for HUL: it is a sought-after employer on B-school campuses. The company was rated as the dream company to work for by graduating students across the top 20 B-Schools in India as per AC Nielsen’s Campus Track Survey, says the company spokesperson. Today, companies like Nokia, Dabur and Cadbury are shining examples of what HUL “alumni” have achieved outside. Perhaps it’s time the organisation needs to take a long, hard look at itself, says the executive. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/jobs/senior-executives-head-for-exit-at-hindustan-unilever/articleshow/5736988.cms

Senior execs head for exit at HUL Read More »

Scroll to Top